Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

RBM Ç¥¸é ¿ÜÃø¿¬°áÇü ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ »ýÁ¸À²°ú º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÈÄÇâÀû ºÐ¼®

Retrospective analysis of survival rate and marginal bone loss on RBM surface external hex connection implants

±¸°­»ý¹°Çבּ¸ 2013³â 37±Ç 2È£ p.98 ~ 104
ÀüÁø¿ë, ±èÁöÇý, ÀÌ°æÁ¦, ¼Õ¹Ì°æ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀüÁø¿ë ( Jeon Jin-Yong ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
±èÁöÇý ( Kim Ji-Hye ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÀÌ°æÁ¦ ( Lee Gyeong-Je ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¼Õ¹Ì°æ ( Son Mee-Kyung ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the survival rate and marginal bone loss of Osstem US II plus implants, which have a resorbable blasted media (RBM) surface external hex connection.

Materials and Methods: Clinical and radiographic data on the implants, which were placed in private dental practice from 2007 to 2011, and functionally loaded for at least 1 year, were analyzed. Patient records were used to evaluate each patient`s gender, age, implant location, diameter, and length, as well as smoking status. To measure marginal bone loss, intraoral x-rays were taken.

Results: A total of 162 dental implants in 61 patients were evaluated. Average surveillance time was 2.5 years. Cumulative survival rate was 100%, and average marginal bone loss was 1.08 mm. There were no statistically significant differences in the amount of marginal bone loss according to gender, implant location, or smoking status.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, we conclude that RBM surface external hex connection implants are clinically useful due to their short-term cumulative survival rate and because marginal bone loss of Osstem US II plus implants showed satisfactory results and met the proper criteria.

Å°¿öµå

RBM surface; Survival rate; Marginal bone loss

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI